Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button

Archives for October 5, 2015

PB mayor hopes to reopen Main Street within weeks

PINE BLUFF — Mayor Debe Hollingsworth said work to clear debris from collapsed buildings and reopen Main Street between Fourth and Fifth avenues has gained steam.

She said the debris removal had been “significantly delayed” while electric crews rerouted a major power source that feeds much of downtown. Hollingsworth said the control unit for the power source was attached to one of the buildings that had been slated to come down.

“Work has picked up now that the delay is over,” the mayor said. “No one wants Main Street reopened more than I do. It’s been a big issue, but I feel like it’s being taken care of. We are hopeful it will reopen in a few weeks.”

An exact date for when officials expect Main Street to reopen has not been set, however.

Main Street between Fourth and Fifth avenues was blocked off in February after the former Band Museum building and a former VFW post collapsed. The buildings were vacant, and no one was injured.

The roadway was partially reopened in the spring but was closed again in July after city engineers determined that two other nearby vacant buildings were in the early stages of collapse.

Danny Bradshaw, the owner of Mr. Brick Antique Brick Buy and Sell, has purchased the properties, along with several others beside them, to demolish the buildings and resell the bricks.

Dee Herring-Gatlin, chairman of the Pine Bluff Historical Commission and a real estate broker, is working closely with Bradshaw on the project but said there is no firm timeline for when the work will be done.

Bradshaw has deferred all questions on the project to Gatlin. While Bradshaw is claiming the bricks, Gatlin is salvaging wooden beams, doors, windows, hand-hewn lumber and roofing tresses.

Hollingsworth said her office has been assured by Gatlin and Bradshaw that their crews are working expeditiously to remove all of the debris so that Main Street can reopen by the end of the year at the latest.

The Pine Bluff Fire Department has been conducting inspections of downtown’s aging buildings over the past year. The city is contacting the owners of buildings deemed unsafe, and they could face fines or jail time if they continue to neglect their properties.

Recently, the owner of a partially collapsed downtown building appeared in court after city officials said he neglected to clean it up or tear it down. Garland Trice was fined $1,000 for defying the city’s orders after the building was condemned in February.

Monticello District Judge Sara Hartness, who presided over the case after local judges asked to recuse, also sentenced Trice to 30 days in jail, which she suspended on the condition that Trice comply with the law.

Trice, who acted as his own attorney, said he plans to hire a lawyer and file an appeal, according to court officials.

Architects have said poor construction practices, along with neglect, have caused many buildings in downtown Pine Bluff to become dangerous over the years.

Meanwhile, patience is beginning to run thin for some Pine Bluff residents dealing with Main Street being blocked off between Fourth and Fifth avenues while the demolition crews work to remove the debris from the collapsed buildings.

Pine Bluff resident April Simms said she has been thinking about opening a downtown business for several months but has put off acting on her ideas due to the street closure and unsightliness of the area.

“It’s just off-putting, seeing downtown this way,” Simms said. “I don’t think the city handled this very well, because all of this mess should have been gone months ago. You have a lot of people who look at this and wonder if it will ever be gone.”

Joe Landers, who runs a small landscaping business in Pine Bluff, said the lack of a direct route through the heart of downtown has delayed him on more than one occasion.

He shook his head Thursday afternoon as he looked at the barricades blocking the street.

“Every detour takes about four or five minutes,” Landers said. “Over time, that can add up. I am not making any money when I am driving around. I am ready for this street to reopen.”

State Desk on 10/05/2015

Article source:

UK City Is Designing a Future of Fewer Cars — By Focusing on Its Roads

Driverless cars are the future of urban transport, not trams or monorails. That, at least, is the official view coming from the British city of Milton Keynes. A town of just over 250,000 residents founded in 1967, Milton Keynes is currently the host city for a set of driverless car trials funded indirectly by the U.K. government — the most ambitious testing yet staged in the world.

If all goes as planned, by 2018, Milton Keynes’ downtown will be served by an on-demand, publicly run system of 30 to 40 driverless two-seater pod cars, which will allow residents to travel between any two points in the city’s downtown without navigating or reacting to obstacles themselves. Beyond the city center, the trials will also test the viability of semi-autonomous connected cars for private use, a fast-developing technology that at present still requires a driver to be present in case of emergencies. These trials, announced in early 2015, are striking in their own right but also came simultaneously with another significant announcement. In March, Milton Keynes Council rejected the idea of building a tram or monorail line, citing high costs, disruption and potential inefficiency. For now at least, Milton Keynes believes that when it comes to exploring the future of greener, safer transport, vehicles for individuals are a better bet than pumping money into mass transit.

North American cities would do well to watch these trials closely. England’s exurban Southeast might seem far from Middle America, but in layout and conception Milton Keynes is arguably the most American of Europe’s cities. Less than 50 years old, it’s a spread-out, strictly zoned, car-dominated settlement that has at times been (rather fancifully) damned as an “Anglo Saxon Los Angeles.” Made up mainly of single-family homes built across a loose grid system, connected by modest, tree-lined highways and centered upon a large shopping mall, Milton Keynes cleaves unusually closely for a British city to late-20th century North American suburban planning ideals. And when it comes to creating greener, cleaner transit, Milton Keynes’ infrastructure and layout — its very character — make it a potentially more relevant example for American transit planners (at least outside North America’s densest metropolises) than anywhere else on the European continent.

Milton Keynes is modeled after a California suburb. (Credit: City of Milton Keynes)

“We’re not built the same way as other U.K. cities that have tram systems,” says Brian Matthews, Milton Keynes’ head of transport innovation. “At the moment, we can’t see a requirement for a tram or monorail system simply because we don’t have the densities or masses of people to move on a fixed track, which would be quite expensive without serving many of our residents. It would leave significant gaps unless we had an extremely comprehensive network whose cost could run into many billions of pounds.”

Tram or no tram, Matthews still knows he’s faced with some serious challenges. Milton Keynes is booming. It’s one of the fastest-growing cities in Britain, and its current layout and transit isn’t ideally suited to coping.

“In the next 10 to 20 years we’ll grow from being a medium-sized place into being one of the top 10 largest cities in the U.K. In the city center alone we have 25,000 parking bays — that’s a tremendous amount of land, especially as we are expecting 40 percent growth in the area,” Matthews says. “Our travel demand is going to go up by about 60 percent in the next two decades, and we simply can’t increase capacity by that amount.”

With this larger-than-life challenge as the backdrop, Milton Keynes has decided its solution can be found in an old maxim, small is beautiful. The city is experimenting with vehicles that, at their largest, will hold the same number of passengers as a conventional car. To do this, they’ve teamed up with a public-private partnership that goes by the improbable name of Transport Systems Catapult. Based in Milton Keynes, the organization is one of seven “Catapult Centers” established by government since 2010 with the goal of boosting U.K. tech innovation by forging links among companies, academic researchers and government. While the results of these Catapult collaborations often involve greener solutions, their primary aim is to boost the economy by encouraging domestic innovation and manufacturing.

In the transport sector, this has meant the creation of a driverless, completely autonomous pod vehicle: the Lutz Pathfinder. Created by RDM Group in collaboration with Oxford University’s Mobile Robotics Group and Transport Systems Catapult, the snug, two-person vehicle uses 19 laser sensors and cameras to monitor its surroundings and navigate the road without a human in the driver’s seat. The pod navigates using a lightning-fast processor that compares the information gathered by its sensors and cameras to data already stored about the area, enabling it to recognize both its whereabouts and any potential obstacles, and drive accordingly. The video below shows a prototype Pathfinder pod on the streets of Milton Keynes. Moving slightly faster than walking pace — roughly at the speed of, say, one of the Dalek robots that stalked Doctor Who in the eponymous British television serial — the pod is able to mingle safely with pedestrians. Sometime within the next two years, this fantastical scene will become a reality when 40 slightly altered versions of the Lutz roll out in Milton Keynes’ downtown.

For a city center like Milton Keynes’, the Lutz’s ability to navigate safely among pedestrians is especially valuable. While parking lots form a ring around the district, there are long distances that shoppers must traverse on foot. For those with difficulty walking, getting around isn’t easy and in a city that anticipates its significant population growth to include young families as well as aging boomers, that is not a good thing. “We feel there’s a mobility issue within our city center,” Matthews says. “Our pods aren’t a mass transit solution. They will provide a door-to-door mobility service, to address a lot of low-demand journeys by providing personalized rapid transit systems.”

A plaza in Milton Keynes’ commercial center. Soon, driverless cars will shuttle residents around the area. (Credit: City of Milton Keynes)

The pod system is only one part of Milton Keynes’ plans, however. Outside its compact center, connected passenger cars will also be rolled out for testing.

Currently in development, with on-road tryouts to begin next year, these cars will resemble standard vehicles already on the road in shape and speed, but will push further toward the goal of total autonomy. So different is the city in layout from the British norm that parallel trials are also being conducted in another British city, Coventry, because conditions there are more typical of the country’s denser, more congested urban average. The goal of the trial is twofold. It will test the cars’ abilities but also introduce the public to the technology, setting up sites toward the end of the trials where locals can try them out on a small, protected circuit. Winning over public opinion is vital here because, unlike with the pod car system, there aren’t as yet plans to create a publicly accessible fleet. While subsidies and other buyer incentives might feasibly end up being made available to attract buyers, the idea is primarily to turn on private owners to the advantages of such cars.

Devised and tested by the government-backed UK Autodrive consortium, the cars could develop such features as autonomous speed control and navigation and respond to most emergencies without human intervention. The consortium’s project director, Tim Armitage, says while a wholly driverless car will take another 10 years to develop, the experiment will build on existing technologies to create a car that can operate fully autonomously at least some of the time.

“There are already driver aids in existence that can be looked at as being semi-autonomous, from adapted cruise control to automatic emergency braking,” says Armitage. “The level of complexity and capability of those systems will increase over time, but the creation of entirely autonomous vehicles is still a decade away, so there will still be a driver behind the wheel who is able to take control if that is deemed to be necessary. Instead [of total autonomy], we’ve set ourselves the challenge of creating cars that will be fully autonomous for part of the time.”

Beyond the ease of driving them, the advantages of these cars could be legion. Echoing driverless car proponents like Google’s Sergey Brin, Matthews believes that the next generation of cars will benefit cities in multiple ways.

“[They] can use the highway network better than traditional cars, because they potentially use less space — you can even lock two together,” he says. “We see them as a method of reducing future congestion by using the road space more efficiently. We’re also thinking about parking cars — automatics can drop off the driver then go and park themselves, which means we could use less space.”

And of course, there is the issue of safety. Driverless cars, he says, “will take away human error, which causes 90 percent of accidents.”

For Milton Keynes, the opportunities extend beyond the city’s roadways. While the pod system trials may well lead to a permanent network in the near future, the connected car trials are more speculative, both testing the technology and opening a dialogue about it among manufacturers, city planners and the public.

“There are no plans to create a fleet of [publicly run] vehicles after the UK Autodrive program,” Armitage says. “The program is all about trialing and demonstrating the technology, enabling the car manufacturers to understand how their vehicle will work in an urban environment, to show the cities how autonomous and connected cars could change mobility provision in the urban environment and to demonstrate to the public what the connected and autonomous features really mean.”

“Wouldn’t It Be Nice If All Cities Were Like Milton Keynes?”

This is not the first time that Milton Keynes has served as a testing ground for a transportation experiment. The year the city was founded, 1967, was the first in British history where over 50 percent of households had access to a car. From its inception, the city responded to social change within Britain by imagining a way of life that had hitherto been out of reach. At the moment when its first plans were being drawn, cars represented aspiration, independence and self-reliance — seemingly, the future of British society.

Those first plans would be created by a University of Pennsylvania-educated British architect named Derek Walker. Walker took inspiration from the work of Berkeley, California-based urban theorist Melvin Webber, who had helped produce the initial feasibility studies for the Bay Area Rapid Transit system (BART) in the 1950s, but later came to believe that BART’s high cost and initial low ridership were evidence that the system — along with others like it — was in part a mistake. This belief led him to posit that the best transit solution for contemporary cities was not expensive, fixed-transit routes such as subway systems, but rather, networks of roads designed for low-density residential communities and the private motor vehicles that Americans increasingly relied on. He subsequently proposed the urban ideal of “community without propinquity” in his 1964 paper “The Urban Place and the Non-Place Urban Realm,” advocating urban planning forms that prioritized the provision of easy mobility and access (and thus freedom of choice) over placemaking and population density. These ideas were so written into Milton Keynes’ DNA that Derek Walker called his California planning guru the “father of the city.”

Webber’s legacy in Milton Keynes is a de-centered, sprawling cityscape based around micro-communities. Dubbed “grid squares” because of their encasement within a grid of four-lane roads, these large blocks contain low-density housing, shops and services designed to absorb existing small villages and be supplemented by the city center based around a single mall. Separating these grid squares from one another are “grid roads” — modest highways labeled as “H” or “V” (horizontal or vertical) separated from the residential areas by careful landscaping. The term “grid,” however, gives a perhaps misleading impression; while the roads segment the city into discrete blocks, these are not actual geometric squares. Instead the grid roads meander slightly along valley bottoms, past parks and strings of lakes to create a more flowing, less regimented impression. Landscaped and sheltered by trees, they offer drivers few hints that they are passing through a town with a substantial population.

For a British person unused to the strict zoning and suburban spread of North America, there’s something uncanny about Milton Keynes’ ability to conceal its own status as a city of a quarter of a million. Residential districts of single-family homes (still more densely laid out than typical in the U.S.) are so thoroughly shielded from the road network that each feels like an island. For the casual visitor, the city downtown is essentially a single sprawling mall. Granted, there is the grid of offices that surrounds the shopping precinct, but it remains largely sullen and unpeopled on weekends, and the mall’s crowds evaporate abruptly beyond its ring of car parks. So rigorously separated are Milton Keynes’ places to live, work and shop that the ensuing calm feels not like a failure in the creation of urban magnetism, but successful realization of the determination to avoid it. It’s as if the city’s planners have striven to ensure that, to paraphrase Gertrude Stein, there is no there there. Add to this such exotica as mall corridors filled with palm trees and utterly un-British street names like 10th Street, and the place starts to feel like an attempt to recreate the San Fernando Valley under the slate gray skies of Bedfordshire.

Green space buffers residential neighborhoods from roads and commercial spaces in Milton Keynes. (Credit: City of Milton Keynes)

This widely circulated TV ad commissioned in the 1980s to encourage settlement in the still new city shows, if not the reality of the city, then at least what it aspired to be — a series of quaint, leafy hamlets in the midst of which suddenly appeared a megamall and a stadium.

This vision is of course no longer fashionable. Indeed the ad’s parting sentence, “Wouldn’t it be nice if all cities were like Milton Keynes?” has an almost dystopian ring to it nowadays. The shift in popular thinking is manifesting in a changing skyline. Near the central mall, fairly tall office blocks have been built and some new developments have eschewed the city’s traditional land use pattern in favor of a more urban mix of offices, homes and places to eat. On the residential periphery, denser apartment housing has also been constructed, facing onto roads in order to more closely resemble a city street.

Recent development in Milton Keynes points to a denser, more urban future for the city. (Credit: City of Milton Keynes)

As the city begins to densify, it has embraced its own brand of transit for these areas, an express bus system.

The proposed bus system will mirror a tram system but run on highways. Matthews calls it a “pseudo-tram.”

It will be “a rubber-wheeled bus that could have some sort of autonomous guidance and a semi-fixed route,” he says. “We have actually started developing areas of the city that have the characteristics to introduce such a system.”

Such changes in direction have not been uncontroversial with residents attracted by the original master plan. Local campaign group Urban Eden has advocated passionately for Milton Keynes to remain faithful to its originally stated vision, seeing densification policies as officialdom caving in to avarice by squeezing more profit from land.

Anti-density activists don’t, however, have to fear Milton Keynes becoming London anytime soon. The city may further densify but short of demolishing everything and starting again, it still must work with the city plan it possesses. That makes the city singularly suitable for autonomous cars and driverless pods.

Semi-Autonomous Sustainability

There’s something striking about all these new transit plans — for driverless pods, semi-autonomous cars and extra-long buses running in spaces carved from existing highway verges. Rather than breaking with Melvin Webber’s vision of a de-centered city, where mobility trumps density and infrastructure is road rather than rail-based, it updates it for our times. Instead of creating alternatives to the road network, Milton Keynes will find cleaner, greener ways to exploit it.

If the city’s pod and connected car trials go well, its landscape could end up looking rather different. The central precinct would remain, but as semi-autonomous cars cut the need for parking lots, they could be replaced by new construction, leaving the downtown ringed by higher, more densely built new streets. Within the precinct, pods will weave comfortably with pedestrians as a familiar unremarked part of the urban crowd. Beyond this central zone, more connected cars would mean less congestion and a dramatic reduction in road accidents, a feature of a city that is greener, denser and less thoroughly wedded to private car ownership than its architects ever envisaged. Further into the future, UK Autodrive’s Tim Armitage imagines a city where the relationship between residents and the vehicles they get around in has shifted completely.

“Looking further ahead, there will be fewer cars in the city,” he says. “Public transport will be integrated and very accessible, people will walk, cycle, use pods and use buses seamlessly. They will be billed for the services they use from a citywide mobility provider. No cars will be parked in the city for extended periods of time, they will simply return to car storage areas on the outskirts of the city when not in use. Fewer people will own a passenger car — [instead] cars will be ‘hired’ when they are needed.”

For late-20th century communities laid out before the combination of residential density and mass transit became urban planning’s holy grail, this approach offers some potential solutions and a little hope. Not every suburban or exurban community has the resources — or desire — to change shape. Should Milton Keynes’ driverless car experiments prove successful, they could prove something of vital importance. Even in the West’s exurban sprawl, it is possible to create less resource-guzzling, more environmentally friendly ways of linking up communities, without resorting either radical redevelopment or massive expense.

Article source:

5 Landscaping Ideas For Sellers



NO PURCHASE OR PAYMENT NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN. A PURCHASE OR PAYMENT WILL NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF WINNING. The Giveaway is sponsored by Pleroma Media Inc., 42 Broadway, Suite 12-235, New York, NY 10004 (“Sponsor”). The Giveaway is void where prohibited or restricted by all applicable law, and all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations apply.  Winners are responsible for any taxes, customs, and duties and like amounts connected with the prizes.

1.  ELIGIBILITY. The Giveaway is open only to legal residents of the 50 states of the United States and the District of Columbia who are the age of majority in their respective jurisdiction at the time of entry (19 in AL and NE and 18 in all other states). Sponsor and its advertising or promotion agencies, those involved in the production, development, implementation or handling of this Giveaway, any agents acting for, or on behalf of Sponsor, its respective affiliates, subsidiaries, licensees, service providers, and any other person or entity associated with this Giveaway are referred to as the “Giveaway Entities.” Employees, officers, and directors of the Giveaway Entities and members of their immediate families (spouses, children, siblings, parents and their spouses), and/or persons living in the same household as such persons, whether or not related, are ineligible to enter this Giveaway.

2.  PROMOTION ENTRY PERIOD: The Giveaway begins on July 14, 2015 at 12:00 a.m. EST and ends at 11:59:59 p.m. October 31, 2015 (the “Giveaway Period”). When applicable, the Sponsor’s computers will be deemed the official time keeping devices for the Giveaway promotion.

3.  HOW TO ENTER. You will receive one entry into the random drawing for the Giveaway Period when you provide a verified e-mail through our designated modal window interface. Limit one (1) entry per person/email address. Multiple entries will be disqualified. All previous winners of any giveaway or contest sponsored by Pleroma Media Inc. are not eligible to enter. Any effort by an entrant to misrepresent himself or herself through the use of aliases or multiple e-mail addresses will disqualify that entrant. Registrations generated by a script, macro or other automated means are void. You must be the rightful owner of the email address provided. In the event of a dispute as to the identity of the winner, the winner will be deemed to be the authorized account holder of the email address provided at the time of entry. Entrants must provide all information requested to be eligible to win. Incomplete or unintelligible entries, in the sole discretion of Sponsor, will be disqualified. Sponsor will not verify receipt of entries and assumes no responsibility for late, lost, damaged, misidentified or misdirected entries.

4.  PRIZE DRAWINGS AND NOTIFICATION OF CHOSEN ENTRANTS. A random drawing will be conducted by Sponsor on or about the first week following the Giveaway Period from among all eligible entries received to award one prize (described below). Selected entrants will be notified by email and will be required to respond (as directed) to the e-mail notification within 72 hours of attempted notification. Failure to respond timely to the notification may result in forfeiture of the prize. Selected entrants may also be required to complete an affidavit of eligibility and liability / publicity release (except where such a requirement is prohibited by law). If the completed Release is not returned within the time specified, the prize may be forfeited. 

One (1) Prize per Giveaway Period:An Apple Watch Sport™, which is a registered trademark of Apple Inc. Approximate Retail Value: $349. Limit one (1) prize per person/household. No substitution, transfer, or cash equivalent for any prize, except that Sponsor, at its sole discretion, may substitute a prize with a prize of equal value, due to unavailability of advertised prize. Each prize will be awarded provided each prize is properly claimed. The prize will be shipped by Sponsor to the winners within 1-5 weeks of the receipt of a signed affidavit for approved entries. Prize winners are responsible for all taxes and fees related to any prize received. Actual retail value of prizes may vary due to market conditions. The difference in value of prize as stated herein and value at time of prize notification, if any, will not be awarded.

5.  ODDS. The odds of winning a prize will depend on the number of eligible entries received for the Giveaway Period.

6.  MARKETING AND PRIVACY. Information collected in connection with entries received for this Giveaway will be used for marketing purposes. By entering the Giveaway, entrants consent to receive marketing emails with updates, offers and promotions from Sponsor or third parties. Entrants may follow instructions contained in each subsequent email communication to opt-out of receiving future email communications, however, Sponsor may still use the email address provided to notify entrant if they have been selected as a winner of this Giveaway. 

7.  CONDITIONS FOR PARTICIPATION. Giveaway is subject to these Official Rules. By participating, entrants agree to be bound by these complete Official Rules. All decisions of Sponsor are final and binding; and entrants agree to waive any right to claim ambiguity in the Giveaway or these Official Rules, except where prohibited by law. In addition, each entrant represents and warrants that all information contained in his/her registration entry is true and accurate. By accepting a prize, winners agree to release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Sponsor, its attorneys, affiliates, together with the respective directors, employees, officers, licensees, licensors and agents of each, including without limitation, their respective advertising and promotion entities and any person or entity associated with the production, judging, or administration of the Giveaway (collectively, the “Releasees”) from any and all loss, damage, injury, death, or other liability, either at law or equity, whether known or unknown, asserted or non-asserted, arising from or in connection with awarding, receipt and/or use or misuse of prize or participation in the Giveaway. This Promotion shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York, regardless of conflicts of laws principles. Any action or litigation concerning this Promotion shall take place exclusively in the federal or state courts sitting in New York County, New York, and each entrant expressly and irrevocably consents to the jurisdiction of and venue in such courts and waives all defenses of lack of jurisdiction and inconvenient forum with respect to such courts. Each entrant agrees to service of process by mail or other method acceptable under the laws of the State of New York. ANY CLAIMS, JUDGMENTS AND/OR AWARDS SHALL BE LIMITED TO ACTUAL OUT-OF-POCKET COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH ENTERING THIS PROMOTION. REGISTERED CONTESTANT HEREBY WAIVES ANY RIGHTS OR CLAIMS TO ATTORNEY’S FEES, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OF ENTRANT, WHETHER FORESEEABLE OR NOT AND WHETHER BASED ON NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE. EACH PARTY EXPRESSLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT TO A JURY. The releases hereunder are intended to apply to all claims not known or suspected to exist with the intent of waiving the effect of laws requiring the intent to release future unknown claims. This Giveaway is void outside the U.S. and where prohibited or restricted by law, and subject to applicable federal, state, and local laws. Sponsor reserves the right to disqualify any entrant it finds to be tampering with the entry process or the operation of the Giveaway or violating these Official Rules.

8.  PUBLICITY AND RELEASE FORMS: Sponsor reserves the right to use the Giveaway for publicity purposes in any media, and to use the name, likeness, and hometown name and/or prize information of prize winners as part of that publicity, without any compensation or prior review, unless prohibited by law. Each prize winner will be required to submit a declaration and a liability/publicity release and confirmation that the prize winner has followed the rules of the Giveaway, in the form supplied by Sponsor (the “Declaration and Release”), and signed by the prize winner. The Declaration and Release must be signed and returned within seven (7) days of notification. Prize won by an eligible entrant who is a minor in his/her state of residence will be awarded to minor’s parent or legal guardian who must sign and return all required documents. In the event the Affidavit and Release is not returned within this period, an alternate winner may be selected for such prize. Any prize notification or prize returned to Sponsor as undeliverable will result in the awarding of that prize to an alternate winner (who will be required to comply with similar procedures).

9.  LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES: The Releasees shall not be liable for: (i) late, lost, delayed, stolen, misdirected, incomplete unreadable, inaccurate, garbled or unintelligible entries, communications or affidavits, regardless of the method of transmission; (ii) telephone system, telephone or computer hardware, software or other technical or computer malfunctions, lost connections, disconnections, delays or transmission errors; (iii) data corruption, theft, destruction, unauthorized access to or alteration of entry or other materials; (iv) any injuries, losses or damages of any kind caused by the prize or resulting from acceptance, possession or use of a prize, or from participation in the Giveaway; or (v) any printing, typographical, administrative or technological errors in any materials associated with the Giveaway. In the event that more prize notice emails are sent for any of the prizes than the number of prizes available as specified in these Official Rules, a random drawing will be conducted from all entrants who received such notices to award number of prizes specified in these Official Rules. Sponsor disclaims any liability for damage to any computer system resulting from participating in, or accessing or downloading information in connection with this Giveaway, and reserve the right, in their sole discretion, to cancel, modify or suspend the Giveaway should a virus, bug, fraud, computer problem, unauthorized intervention or other causes beyond Sponsor’s control, corrupt the administration, security or proper play of the Giveaway. Sponsor may prohibit an entrant from participating in the Giveaway or winning a prize if, in its sole discretion, it determines such entrant is attempting to undermine the legitimate operation of the Giveaway in any way by cheating, hacking, deception, or any other unfair playing practices of intending to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any other players or Sponsor representatives. Use of any automated system to participate is strictly prohibited and will result in disqualification. Sponsor may disqualify at its sole discretion any entries it believes are created by an automated system or exceed the maximum of one entry per natural person/email address. Disputes regarding these Official Rules and/or this Giveaway will be governed by the internal laws of the State of New York, without regard to conflicts of laws principles. Any and all legal actions or claims arising in connection with this Giveaway must be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction within New York County, New York or, at Sponsor’s sole discretion, anywhere else in the United States. CAUTION: ANY ATTEMPT TO DELIBERATELY DAMAGE THE PLEROMA MODAL WINDOW OR UNDERMINE THE LEGITIMATE OPERATION OF THE GIVEAWAY MAY BE IN VIOLATION OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAWS AND WILL RESULT IN DISQUALIFICATION FROM PARTICIPATION IN THE GIVEAWAY. SHOULD SUCH AN ATTEMPT BE MADE, SPONSORS RESERVE THE RIGHT TO SEEK REMEDIES AND DAMAGES (INCLUDING ATTORNEY FEES) TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW, INCLUDING CRIMINAL PROSECUTION.

10.   PRIVACY. Please refer to Sponsor’s privacy policy located at for important information regarding the collection, use and disclosure of personal information by Sponsor.

11.   WINNER LIST. For names of the winners, send your request in a self-addressed, stamped envelope to: Pleroma Media Inc – Email Giveaway Winners List,

42 Broadway, Suite 12-235, New York, NY 10004. Winner lists will be sent out once winners have been verified. The name of the all winners will be posted only for 30 days after the end of the Entry Period.


Apple is not a participant in or sponsor of this promotion.

Article source:

Auburn City Council votes to keep current millage rates

The Auburn City Council made quick work of its new business issues at last Thursday’s meeting, unanimously approving every item on the business agenda including an electronic message board, a community garden-landscaping project, a water-supply project and the replacing of police vehicles.

The council also closed its public hearings to the Auburn-Barrow County millage rate. The rate is staying at 4.931 percent, the same rate it has been since 2008. Mayor Linda Blechinger said it was “very important” to the council.

“As property (returns) to previous market rate, keeping the millage rate static helps to keep costs down for our citizens,” Blechinger explained.

The city will receive $7.3 million loan from the Georgia Environmental Finance Authority (GEFA) Water Supply Fund to fund the water-supply project. Auburn will pay back $23,634 per month beginning Jan. 1, 2018.

The project will develop a new water supply for the city and the work includes the construction of a drinking water treatment plant, intake and distribution facilities, pumping stations, pipelines and storage tanks. The tentative date for completion of construction is Dec. 31, 2017.

The electronic message board had been a topic of conversation for several years, Blechinger says, and with approval, it is a “great accomplishment” to see the project come to fruition, she added. The 12-foot-5 message board will cost an estimated $24,000 and will be paid out of Barrow County SPLOST funds.

The landscaping project, which will take place between the Auburn Police Department and library in downtown Auburn, will cost no more than $9,000 in SPLOST funds. Some of the new shrubbery includes 16 Green Giant Arborvitae trees, 13 Carolina Sapphire trees and 21 Lorapetulum plants. The project has had a “great response” from the community, Blechinger said.

“We expect to have gardens ready for the spring, but this will be more than just gardens, it will be a place for the community to come together,” she added.

The Auburn Police Department is adding four new marked vehicles to its rotation. The estimated $116,000 cost to lease the four will be funded by the yearly fiscal police department budget. The department is also replacing an unmarked car that was declared totaled in September with a 2014 Ford Police Interceptor using money from the insurance carrier and court-technology fees account.

Article source:

Easttown zoners review updates for former Waterloo Gardens site

Devon Easttown Township Zoning Board saw a presentation Tuesday at Beaumont Elementary School regarding a proposed amendment to the zoning of the former Waterloo Gardens site on Lancaster Avenue adjacent to the Devon Horse Show Grounds. Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie, and Eli Kahn Development — together Devon Waterloo LP — presented the Devon Yard project, an urban infill project with retail, residential , dining and parking features. The project would include a large Anthropologie, a Terrain Outdoor retail courtyard, three restaurants including two Mark Vetri dining experiences — a pizzeria and Amis fine dining — and a residential building that has retail space below. Retailers have not yet been identified for those spaces as of yet.

Kristin Camp, counsel for the Zoning Board, opened the meeting with a summary of the project, proposed changes to Zoning Ordinance 455 in the Devon Center Overlay District, and key discussion points for the applicants, the board and the community. Camp suggested, “we are not looking at these changes just for the applicants’ proposal, but for the zoning as a whole in this area.”

Eli Kahn, the developer of the multi-unit residential building on the land, presented a “fly-over/virtual tour” to the audience and board. It was a computer model that merged architectural renderings with actual images from the current site. Many people in the audience commented on how it was helpful to see how the development is going to fit in with the residential side of the project that is bordered by Dorset, Waterloo and Berkley roads.

Key points of concern were the 240-parking space garage in the rear of the property, the “glazing” of the exterior view, and the height and overall size of the 135-unit residential building with retail on the bottom level. Previous zoning for retail in the township called for 50 percent glazing (or window exposure) to the exterior, and the proposed plan has about 25 percent average glazing. David Ziel, chief development officer for Urban Outfitters said, “I am in complete agreement with what the zoning board wants to see for the comprehensive plan of the community (adopted 2001),” but that he could not achieve the full 50 percent.

“Retailers also need valuable display/retail space on the walls, and we don’t want to add fake windows,” said Eli Kahn of Kahn Development of Downingtown.

Ziel explained how the Mark Vetri Pizzeria design had very low exterior window exposure, and the design had to be adapted for Anthropologie and other retail and dining spaces.

Lisa Thomas, Planner for the Zoning Board, said that the idea behind the township window exposure zoning is that there is “a relationship between the pedestrian and the interior of the building.”

Ziel said they made changes to the garage to make it more appealing, adding teak panels/trestles and enhancing the landscaping coverage. Because of the topography of the property, the Berkley corner has a low height on the two-story parking garage. Ziel added that the orientation of the elevator shaft for the garage, the highest point, has been changed so that it is facing Lancaster.

Kahn also made adaptations to the residential property, setting back the top floor by eight feet. The proposed high-end residential property, expected to have several floor plans for 1-3 bedrooms, will include decks on the top floor rather than walls.

“We (the board) appreciate how much work has been done to respond to our concerns,” said Board Member Michael Capeletti in a sentiment echoed by many at the meeting.

At the previous meeting in April, there was a lot of community outcry about noise, traffic and the height of the residential property. At the meeting Tuesday night, there was more excitement about when the project would start. One community resident quipped about the timeline, “I just want to know how soon I can walk there and enjoy a slice of pizza.”

Although there were some concerns expressed about the retention of green space, the potential for traffic and cross-walk safety and the potential for noise because of diners leaving in the evening, the overall tone of the meeting was that the community was excited to see the change.

“I heard in the last meeting about concerns about what we could see with this development, but what I have not heard is what I am tired of seeing — the current condition of Waterloo Gardens,” a resident said.

Mark Stanish and Kristin Camp of the Easttown Township Zoning Board both reminded the audience that they are a “recommending” board and the Waterloo Devon L.P.’s proposal will also have to go before the Chester County Board of Supervisors. When asked by a community member about when the project will start, David Ziel hesitated, saying that it has already taken longer than planned, but that if everything goes well with the current changes to the zoning and it gets through the Board of Supervisors, they could start demolition in the early spring of 2016.

Article source:

Odds and ends

Posted: Sunday, October 4, 2015 12:30 am

Odds and ends

By Bob Beyfuss
For Columbia-Greene Media

The late summer drought was brought to an abrupt end Tuesday night as 3 inches or more rain fell over much of the region causing widespread flash flooding.

We surely needed the rain as many of our streams and creeks had practically dried up. Lawns and fields should turn green once more before frost ends the growing season later on this month.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety.

You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login Now

Need an online subscription?



Current print subscribers

Login Now

Need an online subscription?



Current print subscribers


Sunday, October 4, 2015 12:30 am.

Article source:

Gardening Tips: Enjoy the fall colors

Article source:

Garden Tips: Pick mature green tomatoes before frost hits

Frost is coming, and it is likely to be soon. The average date of the first killing fall frost in our area is Oct. 15, but earlier for cooler spots. Before that happens, and perhaps even a little earlier, gardeners should start picking mature green tomatoes. As we discussed last week, some types of mature fruit will ripen after picking. Tomatoes are one of them.

Our tendency as gardeners is to leave tomatoes on the vine until frost threatens, and then pick everything that has some color. Some gardeners cover their vines with clear plastic to make a sort of greenhouse to keep plants warmer during the day and protect them at night.

However, covering plants with plastic or blankets is not going to help because fruit is injured by night temperatures below 50 degrees. Exposure to repeated chilly nights will damage fruit, resulting in more loss from decay. Once night temperatures drop below 40 degrees, the damage is even greater.

The good news is that mature green tomatoes will ripen well off the vine and still provide the wonderful flavor of homegrown vine-ripened tomatoes. There is no need to pick smaller green tomatoes that have no chance of ripening. Telling the difference is tricky, but not hard. Generally, the fruit should be at least three-quarters the mature size expected for the variety. They will have turned from a bright green to a lighter green or whitish color. They do not need to have started turning red or the expected mature color yet.

Once the fruit are harvested, take them indoors and prepare them for ripening. This is done by first washing them with cool, clean water and allowing them to air dry. If any are cracked or split, they are more likely to rot before ripening, so throw them out or use them in a recipe.

After discarding the damaged tomatoes, sort those that are left. The ones that have developed a tinge of color will ripen first. Put these in one group, and then sort by greenness. The next step for many gardeners varies depending on how many tomatoes they have and the capacity for storage. I recommend placing them in single layers in covered cardboard boxes. (Leave a little space between tomatoes.) Some folks wrap each fruit with newspaper and place them in a box, but this is tedious and makes it difficult to check for ripe or rotten fruit.

Tomatoes will produce ethylene gas as they ripen. Exposure to ethylene gas from another source will speed up the process. If you are in a hurry for ripe tomatoes, place some of your green ones in a closed bag with ripe bananas or tomatoes, because they produce ethylene gas.

Our mothers and grandmothers placed their green tomatoes on the windowsill, thinking that exposure to light was needed for ripening. Actually, they need the warmth, not the light. Tomatoes will take about two weeks to ripen when kept around 65 to 70 degrees. Cooler temperatures, but above 50 degrees, will result in slower ripening.

Marianne C. Ophardt is a horticulturist for Washington State University Benton County Extension.

Article source: